I've been working on a talk for another Ruby conference, and suddenly this classification came into my mind.
A specific Rails developer under a certain conditions can find no reasons to move through this lifecycle and be quite happy staying on phases 1 or 2.
I wonder what do you think of it. Looks like true? Completely incorrect? Missing something?
P.S. What phase are you on currently? ;\)
https://preview.redd.it/xqljrygb9m011.png?width=1357&format=png&auto=webp&s=a053de4ab3a96deb26bba997ad5c0db4fd97d95c
Interesting, I thought the trailblazer part was funny!
Haha great I am on own perfect architecture box.
fuck outta here with node as an alternative
I am on 4. I have found Rails is an excellent starting point. However, at some point you end up with a huge monolith and it become more and more difficult to maintain. Just depends on what your situation is.
Laughed a lot!
What did you use to generate your diagram??
My thoughts? This is incorrect. But, eh, whatever, trendy people will try to be trendy. :\)
I’m 1 and 4. Rails is a tool. If it’s not working for you, you either are using it incorrectly or for the wrong protect. There is no software that’s one stop shop.
I feel like it’s missing an outcome where “trying Hanami, ROM, DRY, Sinatra” results in joy ;\). That’s where I would be. Btw, I would also add “Roda, Sequel” there.
Been in a little phase one loop for about 11 years or so and still loving it.